In venture capital deals, monitoring fees and arrangement fees are provisions that reflect the costs incurred by investors in managing and executing an investment.
These fees are designed to compensate investors for the time, resources, and expertise they dedicate to the deal and the ongoing oversight of the company. However, they can become a contentious point during negotiations, as founders seek to preserve capital for growth while investors aim to cover their costs.
This article in our ‘Anatomy of a term sheet’ series explains how monitoring and arrangement fees are structured, their role in venture capital deals, and how founders and investors can strike a balance to ensure these fees are fair and aligned with the company’s goals.
Monitoring fees are recurring payments made by the company to the investor for the ongoing oversight and strategic support provided post-investment. These fees reflect the costs associated with the investor’s involvement, such as board participation, mentoring, and other advisory services.
Investors often argue that monitoring fees are necessary to:
Arrangement fees (sometimes referred to as commitment fees) are one-time charges payable to the investor at the time of the investment. These fees are intended to cover the costs of executing the deal, such as due diligence, legal expenses, and structuring the investment.
Arrangement fees compensate investors for the upfront costs of:
Monitoring and arrangement fees are negotiable and should be tailored to the size, complexity, and stage of the investment. Founders and investors often consider the following factors:
Investors who provide substantial strategic input, mentorship, and board-level support are more likely to justify monitoring fees. Conversely, founders may challenge these fees if they perceive the investor’s involvement as minimal.
Founders should ensure that fees align with the company’s growth objectives and do not disproportionately benefit the investor at the expense of operational cash flow.
In some deals, fees are offset against other obligations, such as dividends or management incentive payments, to reduce the financial burden on the company.
The British Venture Capital Association model documents typically recommend transparent disclosure of all fees to ensure alignment and trust between founders and investors.
Example of monitoring and arrangement fees in a term sheetClause example – monitoring fee: "the company shall pay the investor an annual monitoring fee of 1.5% of the investment amount, payable quarterly in arrears, for a period of five years or until the investor ceases to hold shares in the company." Clause example – arrangement fee: "the company shall pay the investor an arrangement fee equal to 2% of the total investment amount, to be deducted from the investment proceeds at completion." |
Founders' perspective |
Investors' perspective |
|
Motivations |
Founders aim to minimise fees to preserve as much of the investment as possible for growing the business. They want to ensure that fees are proportional to the value delivered by the investor. |
Investors seek to recover the costs of managing and executing the deal, particularly in more complex transactions. Fees also compensate for the resources dedicated to ongoing oversight and strategic input. |
Preferred position |
|
|
Risks |
Excessive fees may reduce the funds available for operations and hinder the company’s ability to achieve key milestones. |
Overly aggressive fee structures may deter founders or create friction in negotiations. |
Where they align |
Both parties benefit from fee structures that reflect the company’s stage and the investor’s level of involvement. Transparent disclosure and alignment with value-added contributions can foster trust and ensure fees are seen as fair. |
Monitoring and arrangement fees are an important aspect of venture capital term sheets, reflecting the costs and resources investors dedicate to a deal. For founders, negotiating these fees effectively is essential to preserve capital for growth while ensuring that fees remain proportional to the value delivered by the investor.
By aligning fees with market practices and tailoring them to the company’s stage and needs, founders and investors can strike a balance that supports long-term success.
Read the next article in our "Anatomy of a term sheet" series, where we’ll explore exclusivity clauses and examine how these provisions protect deal certainty while managing founder flexibility.
If you're navigating the complexities of venture capital term sheets or preparing your business for investment, our experienced team is here to help. Get in touch to discuss how we can support you in securing the right deal for your business.
Our 'Anatomy of a term sheet' series breaks down each critical section of a venture capital term sheet, offering technical insights and practical real-world examples to help founders with their fundraising journey.
Our aim is to demystify term sheets and empower founders and their advisors to navigate negotiations with clarity and confidence.
Anatomy of a Term Sheet OverviewChris Dyson
Partner and Head of Technology Sector
+44 (0)117 321 8054 c.dyson@ashfords.co.uk View moreRory Suggett
Partner and Head of Corporate
+44 (0)117 321 8067 +44 (0)7912 270526 r.suggett@ashfords.co.uk View moreAndrew Betteridge
Partner & Head of the Commercial Services Division
+44 (0)117 321 8063 +44 (0)7843 265362 a.betteridge@ashfords.co.uk View moreWe produce a range of insights and publications to help keep our clients up-to-date with legal and sector developments.
Sign up