In venture capital transactions, exclusivity clauses are a common feature of term sheets, designed to protect the investment process and ensure that negotiations proceed without interference from competing offers.
For investors, exclusivity provides deal certainty, preventing founders from seeking alternative funding once negotiations have commenced. For founders, however, exclusivity must be carefully managed to avoid undue restrictions that could limit their options if the deal falters.
This article in our ‘Anatomy of a term sheet' series examines the purpose of exclusivity clauses, how they are structured in venture capital deals, and their implications for founders and investors.
An exclusivity clause, sometimes referred to as a “no-shop” clause, is a contractual commitment by the founders (and sometimes the company) to refrain from soliciting or negotiating alternative offers for investment during a defined period.
An exclusivity clause ensures that the investor has the sole opportunity to complete due diligence and negotiate the final investment agreement without risk of being outbid or disrupted by other parties.
Founders should negotiate a reasonable exclusivity period that aligns with the complexity of the deal. For example:
Founders may seek carve-outs to ensure the exclusivity clause does not unnecessarily restrict their flexibility:
To balance the restriction, founders can include break clauses that allow them to terminate exclusivity if:
Example of an exclusivity clause in a term sheetClause example: "the founders and the company agree that, for a period of 60 days from the date of this term sheet, they shall not solicit, negotiate, or enter into any discussions with any other party regarding the sale of equity or other securities in the company. This exclusivity period may be terminated by the founders if the investor fails to provide a draft investment agreement within 30 days of this term sheet." |
The exclusivity period should reflect the complexity of the transaction. Investors may require longer periods for later-stage or cross-border deals, but founders should push back on excessively long restrictions that could hinder their ability to raise capital.
Both parties should commit to advancing the deal in good faith during the exclusivity period. This might include setting clear timelines for due diligence and document negotiation.
The clause should focus narrowly on equity fundraising discussions, avoiding unnecessary restrictions on unrelated commercial activities.
Investors should reciprocate the exclusivity commitment by agreeing to timelines for key actions, such as completing due diligence or providing term sheet updates.
Founders' perspective |
Investors' perspective |
|
Motivations |
Founders want to preserve flexibility to secure alternative funding if the deal falters, while ensuring that the exclusivity period does not hinder ongoing business activities. |
Investors seek exclusivity to protect their time and resources and to avoid competitive tensions with other potential investors. |
Preferred position |
|
|
Risks |
An excessively broad or prolonged exclusivity clause could limit their ability to secure funding if the investor delays or withdraws. |
Overly narrow exclusivity clauses may allow founders to entertain competing offers, undermining the investor’s position. |
Where they align |
Both parties benefit from exclusivity clauses that are clear, reasonable, and proportionate to the transaction’s complexity. Founders and investors can align on mutual commitments to advance the deal efficiently, supported by balanced carve-outs and break clauses. |
Exclusivity clauses are an essential feature of venture capital term sheets, providing investors with certainty while allowing founders to progress towards a deal without unnecessary distractions.
By negotiating reasonable timeframes, clear carve-outs, and mutual commitments, founders and investors can create an exclusivity framework that balances certainty with flexibility, supporting a smooth and collaborative investment process.
Read the next article in our "Anatomy of a term sheet" series, where we’ll explore diversity, equity, and inclusion clauses and examine how these provisions reflect the growing importance of ESG considerations in venture capital deals.
If you're navigating the complexities of venture capital term sheets or preparing your business for investment, our experienced team is here to help. Get in touch to discuss how we can support you in securing the right deal for your business.
Our 'Anatomy of a term sheet' series breaks down each critical section of a venture capital term sheet, offering technical insights and practical real-world examples to help founders with their fundraising journey.
Our aim is to demystify term sheets and empower founders and their advisors to navigate negotiations with clarity and confidence.
Anatomy of a Term Sheet OverviewChris Dyson
Partner and Head of Technology Sector
+44 (0)117 321 8054 c.dyson@ashfords.co.uk View moreRory Suggett
Partner and Head of Corporate
+44 (0)117 321 8067 +44 (0)7912 270526 r.suggett@ashfords.co.uk View moreAndrew Betteridge
Partner & Head of the Commercial Services Division
+44 (0)117 321 8063 +44 (0)7843 265362 a.betteridge@ashfords.co.uk View moreWe produce a range of insights and publications to help keep our clients up-to-date with legal and sector developments.
Sign up