In venture capital deals, leaver provisions play a critical role in managing the departure of a founder or key employee. These provisions are designed to safeguard the company’s equity structure and ensure that shares remain in the hands of those actively contributing to the business. However, they must also balance fairness to founders, particularly in cases where a departure is outside their control.
Leaver provisions set out what happens to a departing individual’s shares, distinguishing between “good leavers” and “bad leavers”, and defining the terms under which shares can be repurchased or forfeited.
This article in our ‘Anatomy of a term sheet’ series, explores why these terms are a key focus of term sheet negotiations and are integral to aligning the interests of founders and investors.
Leaver provisions determine the treatment of a founder’s shares when they leave the company. They categorise leavers as either:
The purpose of leaver provisions is twofold:
Leaver provisions usually grant the company or remaining shareholders the right to repurchase shares. The purchase price depends on whether the leaver is a good or bad leaver.
Example:
• Good leaver: fair market value.
• Bad leaver: nominal value (e.g., £0.01 per share).
Many leaver provisions include time-based gradation, which adjusts the treatment of shares depending on how long a founder has been with the company. This approach recognises the contributions of founders who have been actively involved in building the business over a significant period, while still protecting the company in its early stages.
The standard vesting period is four years, with the first tranche often subject to a one-year cliff.
Common events that trigger leaver provisions include:
Example of leaver provisions in a term sheetClause example: "if a founder ceases to be employed by the company, the treatment of their shares shall be as follows:
A leaver’s classification shall be determined by the board, acting reasonably." |
The distinction between good and bad leavers should be clearly defined to avoid disputes. Grey areas, such as voluntary resignation due to internal conflicts, should be addressed during negotiations.
Leaver provisions ensure that shares do not remain with individuals who are no longer contributing to the company’s success. This is particularly important in the early stages when equity is a critical resource for attracting new talent or investors.
While leaver provisions must protect the company, overly harsh terms can discourage founders or key employees and undermine trust. Investors should consider the long-term implications of punitive clauses on morale and retention.
Term sheets often include a clause allowing the board to exercise discretion in determining leaver status. While this provides flexibility, it can lead to conflicts if decisions are perceived as unfair.
Founders’ perspective |
Investors’ perspective |
|
Motivations |
Founders want to ensure they retain the equity they have earned while avoiding overly harsh penalties for leaving. They aim for clarity and fairness in defining good and bad leavers. | Investors want to protect the company’s cap table and ensure that shares remain in the hands of active contributors. They seek robust bad leaver provisions to prevent disruptive founders from retaining equity. |
Preferred position |
|
|
Risks |
Ambiguously defined bad leaver provisions or overly broad discretion for the board could result in unfair treatment or loss of equity. | Excessive restrictions may deter top talent or create unnecessary conflicts with founders. |
Where they align |
Both parties benefit from well-defined leaver provisions that incentivise long-term commitment while maintaining fairness. Clear definitions, reasonable treatment of good leavers, and flexibility for unforeseen circumstances foster alignment and trust. |
Leaver provisions are a cornerstone of venture capital deals, balancing the need to protect the company’s equity structure with fairness to founders. By negotiating clear and equitable terms, founders and investors can ensure that these provisions support the company’s growth while avoiding unnecessary disputes.
Read the next article in our "Anatomy of a term sheet" series, we’ll explore drag-along, tag-along and co-sale rights, examining how these provisions protect both majority and minority shareholders in exit scenarios.
If you're navigating the complexities of venture capital term sheets or preparing your business for investment, our experienced team is here to help. Get in touch to discuss how we can support you in securing the right deal for your business.
Our 'Anatomy of a term sheet' series breaks down each critical section of a venture capital term sheet, offering technical insights and practical real-world examples to help founders with their fundraising journey.
Our aim is to demystify term sheets and empower founders and their advisors to navigate negotiations with clarity and confidence.
Anatomy of a Term Sheet OverviewChris Dyson
Partner and Head of Technology Sector
+44 (0)117 321 8054 c.dyson@ashfords.co.uk View moreRory Suggett
Partner and Head of Corporate
+44 (0)117 321 8067 +44 (0)7912 270526 r.suggett@ashfords.co.uk View moreAndrew Betteridge
Partner & Head of the Commercial Services Division
+44 (0)117 321 8063 +44 (0)7843 265362 a.betteridge@ashfords.co.uk View moreWe produce a range of insights and publications to help keep our clients up-to-date with legal and sector developments.
Sign up