This article originally featured in the HR Magazine.
The UK Immigration Rules, spanning over 1,100 pages, are complex and difficult to follow.
On 3rd May 2019, two days after MPs referred the Home Office to the Equalities Watchdog over the Windrush scandal, the consultation on the Immigration Rules was closed.
The Law Commission has been warned by the Bar Council of England & Wales that the UK could face another Windrush scandal unless the Immigration Rules are urgently reformed.
This is not the first time that the Immigration Rules have been criticised for being overly complex, piecemeal and in need of reform.
Since the Immigration Act of 1971, there have been numerous amendments to the rules, largely implemented in reaction to current affairs by various governments.
This method of implementation has led to Immigration Rules which are illogically structured, poorly integrated with one another and incomprehensible to those attempting to navigate them.
Lawyers and Judges alike have commented on the complexity of the Rules, with Lord Lloyd-Jones stating in the Supreme Court that “the structure of both the primary and secondary legislation in this field has reached such a degree of complexity that there is an urgent need to make the law and procedure clear and comprehensible”.
All employers in the UK have a duty to prevent illegal working, meaning that all UK businesses should carry out right to work checks before employing individuals, in line with Home Office guidance.
The complexity of the Immigration Rules often leads to ambiguity in relation to individuals’ right to reside (and work) in the UK, particularly where immigration applications or appeals are outstanding, meaning that not all situations lend themselves to the “tick box” exercise of completing a right to work check.
As a result, the risks posed to employers is twofold.
Firstly, failing to obtain documents prescribed by the Home Office as acceptable evidence of right to work leaves businesses vulnerable to the risk of civil penalties being issued if employees are suspected of not having the right to work in the UK. Civil penalties of up to £20,000 per illegal worker can be issued, along with criminal sanctions. Businesses found to have employed an illegal worker are also published on the Home Office's 'name and shame' webpage.
Whilst caution should be exercised when it comes to checking individuals’ right to work status, businesses may also potentially face discrimination claims if they refuse to employ someone on the basis of their nationality. Such claims could lead to substantial compensation being awarded to job applicants, not to mention the reputational damage that can be caused.
Employers are therefore expected to perfect a balancing act which is not discriminatory, however still adheres to the Home Office rules on right to work checks.
Communication is key. Employers are encouraged to work with current and prospective employees to understand their immigration status, with a view to obtaining the necessary documents to protect the business from sanctions.
In complex situations which do not appear to fit neatly into the Home Office right to work checklist and/or guidance, employers should seek specialist legal advice in relation to the individual situation in question. Doing so could avoid substantial fines and damage to your business’ reputation.
For any more information please contact Laura Wonnacott from our Employment Team on l.wonnacott@ashfords.co.uk.
We produce a range of insights and publications to help keep our clients up-to-date with legal and sector developments.
Sign up
