The case of R (Hill) v Cornwall Council and another [2016] EWHC 1264 (Admin) serves as a useful reminder of the relevant principles that those preparing a report for a public body should have in mind when taking a decision that they are required to take. It is also a good guide to those contemplating a legal challenge.
The case was a judicial review challenge in which the claimant sought to quash the grant of planning permission for a synthetic pitch on land within sports fields belonging to a community college. The court referred to the approach that should be adopted towards the reports of planning officers.
The approach that should be adopted in relation to the officer’s report to members of the planning committee were summarised in R (Trashorfield Ltd) v Bristol City Council and others [2014] EWHC 757 (Admin):
The court was satisfied that the committee decision-makers had all the relevant material they needed to address the noise impact of the proposal. Further, the committee was not as alleged, misled about the concerns the environmental health officer had in relation to the use of whistles on the site. The committee knew that the planning proposal would extend the hours of use at the site and that whistles would be used. Therefore, the court rejected the claimant’s judicial review challenge.
When drafting a report for decision-makers or scrutinizing the report with a view to a legal challenge, the following points should be taken into consideration:
We produce a range of insights and publications to help keep our clients up-to-date with legal and sector developments.
Sign up