Skip to main content
  • Ashfords Solicitors
    • Home|
    • About Ashfords LLP |
    • International |
    • Partners |
    • Consultants |
    • Associates |
    • Ashfords History |
    • Clients |
    • Client Feedback |
    • Ashfords' Secure Client DataRoom |
    • Deals Done |
    • Events |
    • News and Publications |
    • Careers |
    • Graduate Recruitment |
    • Offices |
    • Contact
  • Services for Businesses
    and the Public Sector
    • Asset Recovery |
    • Banking and Finance |
    • Commercial Property |
    • Compulsory Purchase |
    • Construction |
    • Corporate and Commercial |
    • Corporate Tax |
    • Defendant Personal Injury and Insurance |
    • Dispute Resolution |
    • Employment and Human Resources |
    • Environment |
    • Intellectual Property and Information Technology |
    • Licensing |
    • Marine and Transport |
    • Mediation and ADR |
    • Planning |
    • Professional Negligence |
    • Projects/PFI |
    • Property Litigation |
    • Regulatory Law, Fraud and Business Crime |
    • Reputation Management |
    • Restructuring and Insolvency
  • Services for Individuals and Families
    • Accidents and Injuries |
    • Buying and Selling your Property |
    • Clinical Negligence |
    • Inheritance Disputes |
    • Crime |
    • Disputes and Litigation |
    • Equity Release |
    • Family and Children |
    • Privacy Law, Defamation and Reputation Management |
    • Wills, Tax, Trusts and Probate
  • Industry Sectors and International Business Group
    • Agriculture and Rural Affairs |
    • Banking and Finance |
    • Care Homes |
    • Charities |
    • Education |
    • Energy |
    • Japan Business Group |
    • Leisure and Tourism |
    • Local Government |
    • Marine and Transport |
    • Retail |
    • Social Housing |
    • Sports Law |
    • Water and Waste
Home
Search Results
Contact Ashfords Share this
  • You are here
  • »Ashfords Solicitors
  • »News and Publications
  • » Local authority resources and section 58 of the Highways Act 1980

Local authority resources and section 58 of the Highways Act 1980

Thursday 15th September 2011


The Court of Appeal judgement in the case of Wilkinson v City of York Council is, on the face of it, a crushing blow to highway authorities. The road in this case should have been inspected every three months. Due to limited financial resources, the local authority only inspected the road annually - the last inspection being 10 months before the accident.

S58 provides a defence to claims against a Highway Authority for failing to maintain the structural condition of highways. However, the defence will succeed only if the local authority can show that it has done all that was "reasonably required" to make the road safe for users.

In Wilkinson, the Appeal Court held that a local authority's resources should not be taken into account when deciding whether they have a defence under s58 of the Highways Act 1980.  Toulson LJ considered that any reliance on limited resources would undercut the purpose of imposing an absolute duty of maintenance on a highway authority.

This judgment is inconsistent with previous decisions of the Court, which have favoured a more balanced approach between private and public interests in relation to the Highways Act. In particular, judges have in the past expressed the clear view that resources are a relevant consideration under s58.  A discussion of what is "reasonably requird" has also been a prominent feature in the debate.  In Wilkinson Toulson LJ concluded that this is an objective test based on the risk of injury arising from various factors set out in s58(2) (of which financial resources is not a factor).  However, judges in previous cases have favoured a concept of reasonableness which balances all considerations, including the authority's financial constraints. 

Even under Toulson LJ's strict interpretation of the s58 defence it seems that there may be room for financial resources and other similar considerations to be indirectly considered under s58 (2).  It would seem illogical to try and assess, for example, "whether the authority knew or should reasonably have been expected to know of a relevant defect" without considering the labour force available and the budget at their disposal for carrying out inspections.

Local authorities must, however, pay attention to any codes of guidance when discharging the statutory burden under s41 of the Highways Act.  If they wish to depart from the code of guidance they should ensure that these decisions have been properly recorded and passed through a thorough consultation process at an executive level.

Key Contacts

Flora Wood

Flora Wood
Partner


T: +44 (0)1392 334020
F: +44 (0)1392 337020
f.wood@ashfords.co.uk

Online Services

Secure Client Data Room Request email updates

Contact Ashfords

For any general enquiries click here to contact Ashfords
  • Sitemap
  • Extranet
  • Exeter
  • Bristol
  • London
  • Plymouth
  • Taunton
  • Tiverton
Footer Logo
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimer
  • List of Partners
  • Terms of Website Use
  • Privacy Policy
All content copyright Ashfords 2012, All rights reserved.

Lexcel ISO 9001-2008 SGS Certification Conveyancer of the Year and Large Conveyancer reccommended in the 2010 iussue of The Legal 500 UK Top ranked chambers UK 2012

Ashfords LLP is Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Ashfords LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered number OC342432. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Ashfords LLP or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualification. We trade under the name of Ashfords, Ashfords Solicitors and Ashfords LLP.
Web Design and Web Development by Optix Solutions.